1 of 1- The Dude
- Buff & Blue Club
Offline - From: Washington DC
- Registered: 7/23/2019
- Posts: 3,175
A10 Parity
Good for the A10? Not good? At various points you had Temple, Xavier, UMASS, dominating the league, even GW in a sense 05-07 (tourney champs, 05, 07, regular season champs 05 and 06, undefeated 06, 16-0) but recently no one program has really stood above the rest. Dayton for one cut short season.
Going back to 2014/15 a different tourney champion every year, in order:
VCU
Saint Joe's
Rhode Island
Davidson
Saint Louis
Dayton regular season champs/No Tourney
The Bonnies
2022 ???
Last edited by The Dude (3/04/2022 9:18 pm)
- Alum '04
- Buff & Blue Club
Offline
- From: NW Columbia Heights
- Registered: 11/10/2019
- Posts: 291
Re: A10 Parity
I love it. Would still like to have Temple and X in the league, of course, but parity in a league is always good, unless it is your school that would be dominating it.
- danjsport
- Buff & Blue Club
Offline
- Registered: 7/23/2019
- Posts: 284
Re: A10 Parity
I’d like it if I thought the parity stemmed from good play; I think the parity is stemming from bad play. So I’m less interested. While GW clearly improved over the course of the season, the reason it finished 7th in the A-10 was a combination of its own talent and play along with the lack of talent and good play from others
- The Dude
- Buff & Blue Club
Offline
- From: Washington DC
- Registered: 7/23/2019
- Posts: 3,175
Re: A10 Parity
Alum '04 wrote:
I love it. Would still like to have Temple and X in the league, of course, but parity in a league is always good, unless it is your school that would be dominating it.
You have to think Temple would too right?
They had made the NCAA Tourney in their last 6 years in a row in the A10, had also made FIVE Elite 8s in the A10
Since leaving the A10 nearly a decade ago...two NCAA trips, 0 wins, both as a double digit seed and round 1 loss.
Last edited by The Dude (3/05/2022 8:07 pm)
- •
Thread Starter