GW Hoops

You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?

6/25/2026 5:48 pm  #1


First Look - 2026-27 Revolutionaries/Colonials

Got a chance to stop by and see workouts today. We have length and shooting ability that seems apparent. It's early and everyone looks like they are putting in work.

Based off of workouts alone and no scrimmaging, particularly impressed with newcomers Felix, Omari and Ryder. In addition, Terrance is long and athletic. I think this team will be deeper and more talented than last year's team overall. We have more options it appears. Replacing Slim will be an issue until someone does it. James looks like he can help. Didn't get a good look at Andrija. They were missing both Lovro and Deng who have not yet arrived. Lovro is expected soon. Deng may take longer. Even Promis looks like he may help. Nobody looked like they didn't belong or couldn't help but again it was just workouts.

Apart from the newcomers, Jean was very solid and Jalen looked improved.

Once I get a chance to see them play live then I will have a better sense of things. It does seem that there will be a lot of competition for minutes this year. 
 

 

6/26/2026 10:52 am  #2


Re: First Look - 2026-27 Revolutionaries/Colonials

Thanks for the info - it's always the most accurate. The problem with the transfer portal
      is no one really knows what we are getting.

 

6/26/2026 11:11 am  #3


Re: First Look - 2026-27 Revolutionaries/Colonials

I'll revert back to a CC interview when he first arrived at GW.   CC mentioned that he would love to play a very deep bench, I'll take this to mean 10-11 players regularly, as long as he had the necessary depth to do so.  So, each year, I've wondered whether this would be the year we see this, but it hasn't happened quite this way yet.  To be fair, you almost must remain healthy in order to have a chance at doing this.

I think the key here is that there cannot be a major talent dropoff between players 1-5 and players 6-8.  And similarly, players 9-11 must be pretty close to players 6-8 in order for a coach to have the courage to try this.  The benefits of course amount to maintaining fresh legs which in turn enables teams to play defensive aggressively (lots of forced turnovers, foul trouble becomes less of an issue) and at a fast pace on offense.  To be fair, we've seen traces of this but not quite the full throttle version.  When you see that those top 3 or 4 players are so good that they must average a minimum of 28-30 minutes per game, then this flies in the face of playing 10 or 11 guys for anything other than token stretches.

Needless to say, it is way too early to speculate on whether this is the roster that convinces CC to trust and utilize his extended bench more than ever before.  Nevertheless, this is something that I've consistently paid attention to, and worth keeping an eye on over the upcoming months.

 

 

Board footera