Transfers landing within the same conference were almost never an issue. First, there was an unwritten law to avoid having to have to play your former school during the regular season. The A10 and the Big 10 used to have rules stating that an intraconference transfer would be forced to sit out two years rather than the one year which was required at the time. And, I believe the player would also have to pay their way for one of those seasons. You may recall Trey Davis who signed a LOI with Hobbs before he was fired, then decided to go play for UMASS instead. GW tried to enforce the two year wait period but was unsuccessful given these circumstances. Not that anyone sits anymore but how preposterous would it sound today to make a player wait a year to play because the coach who recruited him was dismissed?
This brings us to Max Edwards on Wednesday, and Joe Bamisile who will playing for VCU at Smith Center next month. While these situations may become less rare in the future, the notion of a former GW player suiting up for the opposition at Smith Center still has that new car smell to it. (This also would have come up last year had Brayon Freeman not prematurely left his URI team.) Should we feel obligated to boo these guys? Or, take the higher road and welcome them back? Do the individual circumstances regarding their departures factor into this answer?
If we are to analyze the circumstances, these are two very different situations which starts with the individuals themselves. Joe makes anyone's "all-smile" team. He exudes joy on the court and yet most know by now that Joe is a complex person whose highs are quite high but who also experiences his share of lows. Max arguably makes an "all-frown" team, often looking the part of a disinterested bystander. Then of course are their reasons for moving on. In Joe's case, he was very hurt that JC had been released from his contract. He tried a big program once again only to return to the A10. It does stand to reason that had JC remained in place, Joe would have stayed at GW. No way to know for sure but a distinct possibility. As for Max, he began his GW career as a willing "Robin" to JB's "Batman." And that meant scoring when it was needed, playing concerted defense when it was needed, and rebounding which was always needed. Max earned the conference's Rookie of The Year and was in line to make an all-conference team during his next season. That did not work out as planned as Max could clearly see that a post-JB GW team was going to be centered largely around Jun and not himself. He was ejected from one game and was asked to come off the bench for several others. Max leaving GW was amongst the least surprising off-season moves even if this meant parting ways with his one-time high school teammate Christian Jones. That he ended up on the Dukes, where he no longer starts, strikes me as an example of betting on himself and losing.
So back to the original question, it would seem like we should have much love for Joe who left GW after his coach was dismissed and not so much for Max who clearly put himself in front of team (though he is far from alone in this day and age). However, my belief is that taking the higher road is the correct stance in both instances. I'll applaud Max on Wednesday, thinking about his great initial season rather than his lackluster second one. I can also see how potentially detrimental Max's presence could have been on this year's team, and will feel thankful that he moved on. I'll also feel like booing Max is akin to piling on. Given where he is at today (and I'm referring strictly on the basketball court), he likely feels badly over how things have turned. Booing the guy will not offer me any satisfaction.