GW Hoops

You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



3/16/2025 5:43 pm  #1


Fire McGlade already

The A-10, once a reliable recipient of a handful of tournament bids every year, has now been reduced to a pathetic one-bid league. I believe this is the first time the A-10 has been a one-bid league in god knowns how long.

This all lays at the feet of Bernadette McGlade, who spends way too much time honoring athletics flacks instead of working to get more tournament bids for her member schools. This is the only thing that matters---how many teams you get to the dance. It attracts better coaches, players, better salaries, better opponents, the list goes on and on.

McGlade seems to skate by while the A-10 becomes a smoldering wreckage of a once great college basketball league. Fukk you, Bernadette. Leave already.

 

3/16/2025 6:01 pm  #2


Re: Fire McGlade already

Don't know if we can blame the commissioner.  You are right that we have been a mostly 1 bid conference of late, but under McGlade, the Atlantic Ten hs consistently remained one of the top non-power conferences in the nation.   Unfortunately,  forces beyond our control seemed to have changed on us.   If the conference was allowed to schedule as it has in the past and teams can again resume play its fair share of games against power 5 conferences, I think you would have been able to see more bids for the conference.   Of course it will never come to be, but I wish the selection committee would cap the number of bids that could go to any conference.  14 bids to the SEC is ludicrous.

 

3/16/2025 6:24 pm  #3


Re: Fire McGlade already

I think VCU might have been the last team in had Mason won today giving the league two bids, but yeah the path moving forward for the A10 is tough. Dayton did what they had to OOC but still had little room for error in conference play. All the WCC/MW teams benefit from having fewer opponents to choose from out west during the OOC schedule + their conferences are less bloated. We'll see if the MW lays an egg in the first round again.

The A10 needs to start a conference challenge with the AAC or similar conference during OOC play. Even mid-major conferences like the MAC and Sun Belt are doing it! Other quality mid-majors I'm sure would be willing to face a top A10 team on a neutral as well. Gotta get creative - schools like SLU and VCU who were supposedly expected to be at-large hopefuls at the start of the season had subpar schedules. Maybe find a way to get the best teams to play each other a third time or something at the end of the regular season. The weak scheduling for the expected bad teams in the league made sense (GW executed this fairly well to make them a Q2 road game for some teams at least), but the top of the league needed to do more.

Seeing North Carolina make the field is outrageous. The ACC is awful and they had 1 Q1 win. No words. Moving forward, complaining about seeding in the NCAA tournament will basically be a waste of time if leagues like the SEC are going to get 14 teams in. It becomes very hard to get these teams to avoid playing each other in the early rounds when there's so many of them. I thought VCU as an 11 was crazy while Memphis was a 5 but I think the committee was trying to avoid repeat conference matchups rather than care about who was what seed.

 

3/16/2025 6:27 pm  #4


Re: Fire McGlade already

Do you think we'd see some conference realignments if they capped  basketball bids to say  4 and Football playoffs at two per league?  More musical chairs movement than the portal mess.

 

3/16/2025 6:46 pm  #5


Re: Fire McGlade already

dmvpiranha wrote:

I think VCU might have been the last team in had Mason won today giving the league two bids, but yeah the path moving forward for the A10 is tough. Dayton did what they had to OOC but still had little room for error in conference play. All the WCC/MW teams benefit from having fewer opponents to choose from out west during the OOC schedule + their conferences are less bloated. We'll see if the MW lays an egg in the first round again.

The A10 needs to start a conference challenge with the AAC or similar conference during OOC play. Even mid-major conferences like the MAC and Sun Belt are doing it! Other quality mid-majors I'm sure would be willing to face a top A10 team on a neutral as well. Gotta get creative - schools like SLU and VCU who were supposedly expected to be at-large hopefuls at the start of the season had subpar schedules. Maybe find a way to get the best teams to play each other a third time or something at the end of the regular season. The weak scheduling for the expected bad teams in the league made sense (GW executed this fairly well to make them a Q2 road game for some teams at least), but the top of the league needed to do more.

Seeing North Carolina make the field is outrageous. The ACC is awful and they had 1 Q1 win. No words. Moving forward, complaining about seeding in the NCAA tournament will basically be a waste of time if leagues like the SEC are going to get 14 teams in. It becomes very hard to get these teams to avoid playing each other in the early rounds when there's so many of them. I thought VCU as an 11 was crazy while Memphis was a 5 but I think the committee was trying to avoid repeat conference matchups rather than care about who was what seed.

Pretty sure VCU would have been out.  In the interview, the vice chair of the committee said they had a contingency bracket voted on last night that would have UNC out if UAB upset Memphis.  That would mean their inclusion wasn’t contingent on the A10 title game, meaning they were only taking the champ regardless.

And I agree UNC in is outrageous.  No question their AD being chair (despite recusal when UNC comes up) is a factor and their brand name matters.

If an A10 team went 1-12 vs Q1, they wouldn’t even be on the bubble. Not even close

 

3/16/2025 6:53 pm  #6


Re: Fire McGlade already

Not good for college sports. I use to look forward to the NCAA tourney with all the various matchups between all conferences. Now you cannot get good regular season games anymore.  With the tourney now "fixed" I don 't give a crap anymore. Maybe I'll watch Tennessee, but watch the other Big Conference teams, Who cares?  Maybe the rest of the people who came from smaller conferences will turn off their interest and $ also. Too much like the pros now, which I gave up on years ago.


 

 

3/16/2025 7:36 pm  #7


Re: Fire McGlade already

As an old fuddy duddy from the 70's I remember when GW played Georgetown, Maryland, Virginia, American, West Virginia, Pitt, Penn and many more.  It was a blast. 
Fast forward to todays product and you get a seventh year effing student with teammates who have a combined 17 other schools under their belt and coaching carousels, nil $$, endorsements, betting websites and it becomes tainted everywhere you turn.  SEC ought to be ashamed.  
As a fan of the game it has become nearly unwatchable.  I had to make an effort to complete VCU/Mason game today.  It was boring as hell, dirty ball, stoppages every 4 seconds, crappy sportsmanship and quite the psychotic crowd.  Contrast that to Yale/Cornell which was a great game with mutual respect and great coaches. Give me that any day of the week. 
There are too many fingers in too many pies.  I agree there needs to be in season regional tourneys.  The national picture is out of control and getting worse.  

 

3/16/2025 8:37 pm  #8


Re: Fire McGlade already

4 at large bids outside of the power conferences, and 3 of these are from the Mountain West. A10 regular season AND tournament champ gets an 11 seed. 14 bids for a conference with 16 teams. When are the non-power conferences going to get together and say enough is enough, we’re not playing in your rigged tournament? Let’s see how many people watch with no “Cinderellas.”

March Madness is now the A10 Tournament for me. I don’t give a crap about the NCAAs.

 

3/16/2025 9:45 pm  #9


Re: Fire McGlade already

As an old fuddy duddy from the 60's I remember playing The Hoya's, Md. home and home every year. W. Va was a big rival. Jerry West .Usually at Fort Mayer. If it was a big game it would be at some ice arena. Went to the first game at the Smith center.
Not making much of a point here but things are certainly different now. Not necessary better.
Lets hope we can keep Castro.
 

 

3/16/2025 10:17 pm  #10


Re: Fire McGlade already

I agree with the concerns about being a one bid conference but it is also clear our league improved significantly compared to last year. I disagree strongly with H.R. 71's negative comments about the VCU-Mason game. to me it was well played with two talented and passionate teams that both deserved to be selected. Mason was 24-4 after a 1-2 start and VCU is plenty talented and well coached. I watched them both in person in our tournament and had to admit they much more experienced and at a higher level than GW.

 

3/17/2025 2:00 pm  #11


Re: Fire McGlade already

Over the last 15 years, the Atlantic 10 has been incredibly stable, with an average ranking (2011-2020 RPI, 2021-25 NET) of 8.3125. We've been ranked 7th-9th 10 times, 6th twice, and 10-12th 4 times.

I think we've been pretty incredibly stable as a conference despite a lot of membership changes. VCU was a dynamite addition. Mason has been inconsistent, but has the pieces to thrive. Davidson is probably a toss-up in the post-McKillop the Elder era. Losing UMass sucks from a historical perspective, but they aren't what they used to be anyway. These have been very, very choppy waters, but the conference has stayed upright throughout.

Whether McGlade has negotiated the TV deals the conference needs I can't say, but I'm not sure what more we'd be asking from a commissioner. Would you rather be like the WCC and have Gonzaga and Saint Mary's go to a million tournaments while the rest of the conference languishes? No thanks. 

Other Average Rankings:
BIG EAST: 3.1875
American: 7.833
Mountain West: 8.5
Missouri Valley 10.625
 

 

3/17/2025 2:07 pm  #12


Re: Fire McGlade already

Alum '04 wrote:

The A-10, once a reliable recipient of a handful of tournament bids every year, has now been reduced to a pathetic one-bid league. I believe this is the first time the A-10 has been a one-bid league in god knowns how long.

This all lays at the feet of Bernadette McGlade, who spends way too much time honoring athletics flacks instead of working to get more tournament bids for her member schools. This is the only thing that matters---how many teams you get to the dance. It attracts better coaches, players, better salaries, better opponents, the list goes on and on.

McGlade seems to skate by while the A-10 becomes a smoldering wreckage of a once great college basketball league. Fukk you, Bernadette. Leave already.

This is the second time in the last three years that the A-10 had just one bid.   The league has received just ten bids in the last six tournaments for an average of 1.67 bids per season.  The last year the league had more than one at large was back in 2018.
 

Last edited by TJT85 (3/17/2025 2:08 pm)

 

3/17/2025 2:27 pm  #13


Re: Fire McGlade already

creeksandzeeks wrote:

Over the last 15 years, the Atlantic 10 has been incredibly stable, with an average ranking (2011-2020 RPI, 2021-25 NET) of 8.3125. We've been ranked 7th-9th 10 times, 6th twice, and 10-12th 4 times.

I think we've been pretty incredibly stable as a conference despite a lot of membership changes. VCU was a dynamite addition. Mason has been inconsistent, but has the pieces to thrive. Davidson is probably a toss-up in the post-McKillop the Elder era. Losing UMass sucks from a historical perspective, but they aren't what they used to be anyway. These have been very, very choppy waters, but the conference has stayed upright throughout.

Whether McGlade has negotiated the TV deals the conference needs I can't say, but I'm not sure what more we'd be asking from a commissioner. Would you rather be like the WCC and have Gonzaga and Saint Mary's go to a million tournaments while the rest of the conference languishes? No thanks. 

Other Average Rankings:
BIG EAST: 3.1875
American: 7.833
Mountain West: 8.5
Missouri Valley 10.625
 

The Mountain West seems to be the only non power conference to figure out how to get multiple teams in the NCAA Tournament. They got 6 teams in last year and 4 teams in this year, including 3 of the 4 at large bids that went to non power conferences. Does anyone on here know what they have done that the A10 and other mid majors haven’t?

 

3/17/2025 2:55 pm  #14


Re: Fire McGlade already

The A10 has essentially been a one bid league for a number of years now.  The only difference this year is that the best team won the conference tournament, so for a change, we did not have a bid stealer..  Remarkably, had Mason won yesterday, it would have continued a streak where 9 different member schools won the tournament over the past 9 tournaments.  And had Dayton won during the cancelled Covid year, as they were widely expected to do, the streak would have reached 10.

There are numerous reasons why we are where we're at.  Bigger conferences means more conference games which lessens the number of opportunities to play majors in OOC games.  Playing so many conference games also reduces the need on the part of majors to test themselves in their OOC schedules.  As for the Mountain West, it's worth noting that: a) the Pac 12 has exploded and b) there are far fewer high quality teams in this region.  So many of these schools rely upon one another for high quality matchups that won't ding one's rankings or ratings.  Scheduling more of these opportunities simultaneously results in scheduling far fewer cupcakes.

Firing Bernadette is a bit like firing the manager of a fax machine store because nobody is buying fax machines anymore.  You had best believe that Bernadette was very much involved in the A10's media and digital contracts; this was one of her primary responsibilities when she was formerly employed by the ACC.  Unless there is someone else out there who would be far more effective at convincing the majors to give A10 teams more games and at reasonable terms (not, "we'll play you every year but always at our place and we get the entire gate"), I don't believe it's our Commissioner who is somehow responsible for the changing times that have hampered the A10's progress. 

 

3/17/2025 3:21 pm  #15


Re: Fire McGlade already

Worth noting that in the Mountain West, there are 5 teams that are top 75 (which means playing them on the road is a Q1 game), and the A10 had three. Saint Joe's was #76. 

Also worth noting that Air Force had the fewest Q1 games in the Mountain West with 5. Utah State had 6. The rest had 7 or more.

Dayton played 6 Q1 games (going 3-3, incredibly). Mason, Davidson, and La Salle each played 5 (winning just one game between them), and the rest played 4 or fewer. GW, Rhody and Duquesne all went 0-1 in Q1 games.

SCHEDULE. SCHEDULE. SCHEDULE.

 

3/17/2025 3:24 pm  #16


Re: Fire McGlade already

They understood early on how to manipulate the NET so that a good chunk of their conference games are Quad 1 and Quad 2 opportunities.  The key is to play non con schedules designed to get their top teams in the top 75 in the NET.   For example, Utah State played 6 Q1 games. Only 1 of those was against a team NOT in the MWC.  New Mexico played 7 Q1 games, 5 against the MWC. 

The A10 has a problem where #1 our top teams don't win enough in the OOC to set ourselves for this same manipulation and #2, there are 4 more teams to blow up our top teams' NET rankings.  To #1, it's not just that the A10 needs to schedule harder but also, we need to do a better job of blowing out the Quad 4 teams we do play.   Too many teams (not just GW) win by 10 when we need to be winning by 25.  In a perfect world we'd be beating NEC teams something like 84-58. 

 

 

3/17/2025 4:24 pm  #17


Re: Fire McGlade already

creeksandzeeks wrote:

Worth noting that in the Mountain West, there are 5 teams that are top 75 (which means playing them on the road is a Q1 game), and the A10 had three. Saint Joe's was #76. 

Also worth noting that Air Force had the fewest Q1 games in the Mountain West with 5. Utah State had 6. The rest had 7 or more.

Dayton played 6 Q1 games (going 3-3, incredibly). Mason, Davidson, and La Salle each played 5 (winning just one game between them), and the rest played 4 or fewer. GW, Rhody and Duquesne all went 0-1 in Q1 games.

SCHEDULE. SCHEDULE. SCHEDULE.

I quickly compared the OOC SOS for A10 vs. MWC teams on KenPom and it was very eye opening. The A10 average OOC SOS ranking was 271 compared to 156 for the MWC. Here is a breakdown:

OOC SOS Ranking Range  - # A10 Teams - # MWC Teams
001-100 - 1 A10 - 3 MWC
100-200 - 1 A10 - 4 MWC
200-300 - 8 A10 - 4 MWC
300-364 - 5 A10 - 0 MWC

There has been a lot of discussion on here about how A10 schools can't schedule quality teams in the OOC, but the Mountain West teams seem to be able to do it.

 

3/17/2025 5:15 pm  #18


Re: Fire McGlade already

Mountain West has football (even if San Jose St and Wyoming are not Ohio $t or Alabama). So not a peer conference to compare the A10 to.
The A10 has had inept leadership in its history, and I have my issues with the current regime, but to say that present A10 leadership has steered the conference poorly through the Pandemic, reallignment and the NIL transition is a tad overblown.

 

3/17/2025 5:48 pm  #19


Re: Fire McGlade already

Well, we can control our own schedule, if not the league's.
And while acknowledging it and appreciate the point brought our attention by 0509, just as a general principle, the idea of having to beat up on lesser teams to manipulate your rankings is just a bad thing. 
  It may be the reality of what you need to do these days, but it's a pretty evil idea.

 

3/17/2025 9:38 pm  #20


Re: Fire McGlade already

GW0509 wrote:

They understood early on how to manipulate the NET so that a good chunk of their conference games are Quad 1 and Quad 2 opportunities.  The key is to play non con schedules designed to get their top teams in the top 75 in the NET.   For example, Utah State played 6 Q1 games. Only 1 of those was against a team NOT in the MWC.  New Mexico played 7 Q1 games, 5 against the MWC. 

The A10 has a problem where #1 our top teams don't win enough in the OOC to set ourselves for this same manipulation and #2, there are 4 more teams to blow up our top teams' NET rankings.  To #1, it's not just that the A10 needs to schedule harder but also, we need to do a better job of blowing out the Quad 4 teams we do play.   Too many teams (not just GW) win by 10 when we need to be winning by 25.  In a perfect world we'd be beating NEC teams something like 84-58. 

 

Coach Caputo has talked about how the league wants every team to schedule to win like 75% of its OOC games.

I think the league is slow to react. That is a scheduling philosophy that would be brilliant in the RPI era, but now it only works if you’re absolutely obliterating the weak OOC teams.

In fact, if the RPI were still in effect, we’d be a multi-bid league (which is part of why the cartel moved away from it).  George Mason’s RPI is 29. Dayton is I think 54.  And there were 6 or 7 top 80.

We have to move past RPI-era scheduling and figure out how to operate in the new world where, apparently, WAB and SOR count more than even Q1 wins (or at least they did this year when UNC benefited from the new criteria).

 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum