GW Hoops

You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



8/02/2021 1:25 pm  #121


Re: 2021-2022 Schedule

Classic GW.  Unless I’m the fool (possible), there’s a mistake in the schedule announcement.

It says we are playing UC San Diego and UC Fullerton, and says they are from thr WAC and Big West. 

Problem is, there’s no San Diego in the WAC (and Fullerton is big west).

There’s UC San Diego, who just played their first year of D1 and is also in the Big West.  And there’s University OT San Diego, who is in the WCC. There’s also San Diego St in the MWC, though it’s not them. 

So who are we playing?  Is it UC San Diego, the new D1 team in the Big West or San Diego the more established team in the WCC?  (I hope it’s the latter, but with this sad schedule, it’s probably not)

Here’s the line from the announcement: The Colonials then head to the West Coast for a pair of contests with UC San Diego (Nov. 13) and Cal State Fullerton (Nov. 16). GW has never faced either program out of the WAC and Big West, respectively

 

8/02/2021 1:37 pm  #122


Re: 2021-2022 Schedule

Free Quebec wrote:

Here’s the line from the announcement: The Colonials then head to the West Coast for a pair of contests with UC San Diego (Nov. 13) and Cal State Fullerton (Nov. 16). GW has never faced either program out of the WAC and Big West, respectively

GW has played CSU San Diego (last time was on a neutral court in some city with a claim to offering pretty good deli) and the private University of San Diego is in the WCC. UC San Diego is a team GW has never played before and will be in the Big West this season.
The release and subsequent schedule also refer to "UC San Diego" so my guess is it is UCSD (which will probably reciprocate by calling GW the "Colonels" in its press release!).

 

8/02/2021 2:21 pm  #123


Re: 2021-2022 Schedule

Not one non-conference weekend home game to bring kids to?  Seriously?  They really know how to build a fanbase...

 

8/02/2021 2:48 pm  #124


Re: 2021-2022 Schedule

Between the style of the gym (fieldhouse with bleachers), the gold and blue color scheme, and the main student gym in the same building, the UCSD game will feel like a bizarro home game if you squint hard enough. Just replace politics with surfing as the main competition for students' attention and you're all set.

Also if you're hungover the next day get a California Burrito, the true San Diego delicacy (though fish tacos can be a close second)

GW and UCSD grad.

 

8/02/2021 3:02 pm  #125


Re: 2021-2022 Schedule

fidel wrote:

Also if you're hungover the next day get a California Burrito, the true San Diego delicacy (though fish tacos can be a close second)

You forgot to mention that, COVID-allowing, you are right next door to what (as per Krusty the Klown) is the "Happiest Place on Earth-- Tijuana, Mexico!"

 

8/02/2021 3:27 pm  #126


Re: 2021-2022 Schedule

I'll just say it right now.  If this team finishes the A10 Tournament with 25 wins and does not automatically qualify, it's not going Dancing with this schedule.  I know, half of you would giddily take 25 wins in a heartbeat against any level of competition at this point and the other half think it's beyond crazy to even hint at this.

 

8/02/2021 3:51 pm  #127


Re: 2021-2022 Schedule

fidel wrote:

Also if you're hungover the next day get a California Burrito, the true San Diego delicacy (though fish tacos can be a close second)

GW and UCSD grad.

There's nothing finer than San Diego cuisine: California Burritos, Fish Tacos, and Carne Asada Fries. 
 

Last edited by GW0509 (8/02/2021 3:51 pm)

 

8/02/2021 4:59 pm  #128


Re: 2021-2022 Schedule

Gwmayhem wrote:

It's out.  It's pretty bad.  Rising, since you said that it wouldn't be the best OOC schedule ever but it wouldn't be the worst one either, maybe you can let me know which one or ones have been worse.

6 home games...I haven't looked anything up but at first glance, it looks like either Boston or Radford would be the big games.  

Less than a 48 hour window between playing at Maryland and at San Diego?  That sounds barbaric.

Sure, the program needs wins.  Needs a new culture.  I get it.  If this schedule doesn't do the trick, I am not sure what schedule would.  

There are arguably a few either right there or worse ...

2005-06
2008-09 - I don't believe we played a ranked OOC opponent
2009-10
2010-11
 

 

8/03/2021 6:18 am  #129


Re: 2021-2022 Schedule

A chance to avenge Coppin State! EPIC.

 

8/03/2021 8:26 am  #130


Re: 2021-2022 Schedule

Gwmayhem wrote:

I'll just say it right now.  If this team finishes the A10 Tournament with 25 wins and does not automatically qualify, it's not going Dancing with this schedule.  I know, half of you would giddily take 25 wins in a heartbeat against any level of competition at this point and the other half think it's beyond crazy to even hint at this.

I'm certainly in that half!  I get all the complaints about the schedule, but if we're rebuilding this program, then this is the kind of schedule we want.  We need wins.  We need a season that makes the players happy (so they stay), the students happy (so they come out to games), and the alumni happy (so they give), and the administration happy (so they keep JC).  This will lead to greater recruitment success, greater retention of players, and less negativity around the program.

You all want us to run when we are barely walking.

Bring on that 25-win season...I'll take it!

 

8/03/2021 8:36 am  #131


Re: 2021-2022 Schedule

This is objectively a very weak schedule, but hopefully (and more importantly) it leads to more wins this season. As of now, I would hope we don't lose more than three games OOC (and you could make the argument that more than two losses would be a disappointment, but realistically three losses is a bit more fair).

I actually think the Naples tournament is a solid field for where we are at right now, but outside of that tourney and Maryland the rest of the schedule is not overly exciting. We are traveling all the way to California just to play Cal St Fullerton and UC San Diego? Was hoping we would at least play someone like San Diego (WCC - they are around the same stage as us in rebuilding currently and bring in some good transfers), Loyola Marymount, or Fresno State for one of the games. UMass Lowell/Boston U feels redundant and so does Coppin State/Maryland Eastern Shore. A slight nitpick, but would have preferred we play at least one somewhat competitive team in December as A10 play approaches. We finish the slate with Coppin State, Radford, and Maryland Eastern Shore which is definitely underwhelming. At the very least we are playing some new teams this year which could be interesting.

St. Francis (PA) took a major step back as they lost their top two scorers from the previous season that combined for 37 ppg. They barely finished above Central Connecticut State in the NEC last season, but maybe part of that was due to COVID. They don't take a lot of threes and their interior defense is atrocious, partly because they have several raw big men who don't block a lot of shots.

Maryland is obviously the highlight, not even taking into consideration the Lindo connection. The Terrapins return Ayala + Hart and bring in a lot of promising transfers like Russell, Martinez, Wahab, and Dziuba (a good player to take a chance on). Similar to our team, they don't offensive rebound particularly well (that changes a bit with Wahab in the fold) and struggle with turning teams over, which is good for us as turnovers have plagued our team for the past several years. Maryland is pretty good at not sending the opposition to the line which could be an issue for us as we got a good chunk of our points at the FT line last year as the three point shooting was not present.

UC San Diego officially joined D1 last year. They were 30th in the nation in three point shooting at 38% but couldn't defend anyone. They lose two double figure scorers and they are still in the process of becoming a competitive team in the Big West. They are probably a middle of the pack team at best and are definitely behind teams like UC Irvine, UC Santa Barbara, and UC Riverside. The Tritons took the eighth most threes in the country and were fourth in assist rate. Hey, at least we won't be playing zone defense in this one.

Cal St. Fullerton brings back their top two scorers from last year. Both have the last name Maddox but I don't believe they are related. The Titans were even better from behind the arc, ranking 15th nationally in three point percentage. Much like UC San Diego though they couldn't guard anyone. They somehow let teams shoot nearly 40% from behind the arc, which I have to imagine is at least a little bad luck. They aren't overly big down low. At least we aren't facing Northridge, a team that will be an absolute train wreck this year. How did they think hiring Gottfried was going to be a good idea?? Anyways, Fullerton bring in some interesting transfers like Milstead from San Francisco and Anosike who was good at Sacred Heart before not playing much at Tennessee. Even with that I don't see them finishing particularly high in conference unless their defense somehow improves significantly.

UMass Lowell loses their best player from last season. They get to the line a lot, but aren't particularly great at making free throws. Lowell also offsets trips to the line by fouling their opponents a lot and allowing them to shoot a lot of FTs as well. The River Hawks actually block a fair amount of shots, but the team is mostly meh and I think they take a step back this year.

Wright State might be our second hardest opponent in the OOC slate, but I am not sure if that says a lot. The Raiders were good in pretty much every statistical category, but Loudon Love had a lot to do with that and he opted to go pro. Still, they bring back four other players who averaged 10+ ppg and have a strong culture of winning. They were pretty much being chased in the Horizon last year, but I think they might find more success this year when people are overlooking them in favor of Cleveland State (who made the NCAA tournament) or Milwaukee (they landed a 5 star player over Duke because he is the coach's son).

Kent State is always solid in the MAC and will likely finish in the top half again this season. I think they replaced Ball State and that is a net upgrade in my book because the Cardinals never meet expectations. We should be playing James Madison more often and I think they are on the rise in the CAA. A bit disappointed we aren't facing any CAA teams this year outside of the tourney. East Tennessee State has honestly recovered a lot quicker than I expected them to after they unacceptably fired their coach because he allowed his players to kneel during the national anthem. They are definitely better than Middle Tennessee, who I think was the original opponent. Murray State had a down year, but they bring in some good transfers and will likely give Belmont a bigger fight in the OVC closer to what they usually do. The OVC is going to be even more top heavy with Jacksonville State and Eastern Kentucky departing for the Atlantic Sun. Missouri State is usually very solid, but it's tough to say that they are going to be better than Drake, Northern Iowa (with Green), and even still Loyola without Krutwig. They are the definition of an NIT team but will nevertheless be a good test. Long Beach State has underperformed the last several seasons, and I am surprised Monson is still coaching there. This is a pretty good job and they should be a lot more competitive in the Big West. It would be funny if we somehow ended up playing three Big West teams OOC.

Boston U returns their top four scorers but defensively they were really bad. Teams shot 54% from the field against them, and the only thing "they" did well at on that end was opponent FT%, which is more good luck than anything else. I don't see what we get by playing Boston U that we couldn't get by just playing American (or even Loyola MD) but I guess American is not a possibility the next four years until Lincoln graduates.

Charlotte lost their last eight games of the season, but add some impactful transfers with three coming from Clemson, Ohio State, and Syracuse to support Jahmir Young. Hopefully we can avenge the close loss from last year. I believe we lost to their assistant coach in that game as Sanchez was out for that game. They are one of those teams that defensive rebound better than offensive rebound. Their strength lies in winning the free throw battle. They are top 50 nationally in taking free throws and preventing the opposition from taking free throws.

Coppin State isn't going to be good this year, but I'm rooting for local guy Anthony Tarke to make the Pistons after he got a summer league deal. His younger brother Nendah will be the leader as the Eagles lost all three of their double figure scorers. I don't understand why we can't just play Howard. At least there is a local connection there. We beat Coppin by 16 last year.

Radford has been solid the past several years, but their coach Mike Jones left for UNC Greensboro after Wes Miller took the Cincy job. This definitely seems like a team that will be rebuilding the next few years though Darris Nichols looks like a good local hire and he is certainly getting after it with recruiting. No problem with playing them this year, but I am scratching my head a bit in agreeing to a home-and-home with them. Maybe I'm holding out hope that we will be competitive enough to have a stronger schedule next season. Would have preferred to do a home-and-home with a SoCon team instead (maybe even aforementioned UNC Greensboro), not one from the Big South.

Maryland Eastern Shore was one of ten teams that didn't play a game last year. There is the AJ Register connection, but otherwise not much interesting about this matchup. The Hawks really struggle to shoot the ball, but the MEAC is down to eight teams so they definitely have more of a shot now. I also do remember us playing them close at home a few seasons back so nothing is really a gimme right now.

To wrap up, here are the KenPom finishes from last year:
Maryland 35th
Wright State 73rd
Missouri State* 88th
Kent State* 115th
East Tennessee State* 128th
Murray State* 173rd
James Madison* 177th
UMass Lowell 230th
UC San Diego 231st
Charlotte 234th
Long Beach State* 242nd
Radford 243rd
Cal St. Fullerton 255th
Boston U 260th
Coppin State 291st
St. Francis (PA) 312th
Maryland Eastern Shore 355th
 

 

8/03/2021 9:00 am  #132


Re: 2021-2022 Schedule

dmv-- you wanted GW to schlep out west and go to... FRESNO? This trip is about going someplace "nice" and "attractive" to potential recruits. Fresno is niether. GW already goes to Dayton, Fresno is just Dayton with good Mexican food.
Yes, LMU, USD, SDSU, U$C, UCSB or Pepperdine would be a more enticing opponent than UCSD, but at this point saying "We are willing to go beyond our region and get out of the (wonderful...NOT!) mid-Atlantic winter weather" is more important than playing a recognized name.
As for the W´s and L´s, I expect plenty of the former but let´s put the kibbosh on "25 wins" talk. Let me see this team play first, then ask me if they are a 1 or 2 seed! The first chance to do that is the exhibition vs Hood.

 

8/03/2021 9:16 am  #133


Re: 2021-2022 Schedule

Thanks DMV!

 

8/03/2021 9:51 am  #134


Re: 2021-2022 Schedule

Top 7 all have a KenPom at least 50 spots higher than GW

GW KenPom #227

GW picked 13th in a 14 team mid major.  It's clownish to complain about the schedule in this context.  Or belittle the competition when our KenPom is 227

 

8/03/2021 10:19 am  #135


Re: 2021-2022 Schedule

Time to compare bad schedules.  All based on final KenPom rankings; this year's schedule is based on last year's KenPom rankings.  In order from cupcakiest to challenging:

Of the four seasons GWRising provided as candidates, this year's schedule beats (is worse than) 3 of these IMO.  Karl Hobbs's 2005-06 schedule is still safe.

2005-06:  11 OOC games

Games vs top 100:  2   
Games vs. top 200:  2
Games vs. those in the 300's: 4

That's right, zero games played against those with rankings in the 100's.  BU, ranked #203, was the third toughest game on the schedule.  Over 1/3 of the OOC games against teams ranked 308 or worse.  This schedule will never be beat.  A true thing of ugliness.

2021-22: 13 OOC games

Games vs. Top 100: 2 (one of these is Wright State)
Games vs. Top 200: 4 (unless we play Long Beach State in Naples in which case it will be 3)
Games vs. 300 or worse:  2 (UMES gets this distinction despite having not played last season, but would it be any different if they had played?)

So, at least 9 of 13 games will be played against schools ranked 230 or worse.    I like winning as much as the next person but given the talent on this year's team, I would be surprised if many of these weren't blowout wins against inferior competition.  Personally, I would have preferred to swap a pair of 200+ teams for a pair of 100-150 teams.  Give these players some better games!

2009-10:  13 OOC games

Games vs Top 100: 1
Games vs. Top 200: 6
Games vs. 300 or worse:  2

Take away points for scheduling Providence (#90) as the sole top 100 team but grant points for playing four games between 111-147 plus another at 162.


2010-11:  12 OOC games

Games vs. Top 100:  2
Games vs. Top 200: 6
Games vs. 300 or worse:  1

Some luck was involved here as pre-A10 member Mason finished with 27 wins and a #24 KenPom ranking.  None of the top 200 games was worse than 170, and the top 200 # of 6 would have been 8 had this metric read Top 208.

2008-09:  12 OOC games

Games vs Top 100:  3
Games vs. Top 200: 6
Games vs. 300 or worse: 2

Two top 60 opponents in Maryland and Auburn, plus Vermont sitting at 84.   Of course, following up Hawaiian losses to Hawaii (214) and Coppin State (267) with a loss at Longwood (311), perhaps this schedule could not have possibly been easy enough.

 

8/03/2021 10:29 am  #136


Re: 2021-2022 Schedule

A couple of points:

1. Looking at last year's KenPom (and we need to remember that that previous results are not indicative of future results), we have something like this ...

Games against top third (top 117) - potentially four
Games against middle third (118-234) - potentially six
Games against bottom third (235-351) - potentially seven

Depending on how the Naples tourney shakes out this schedule could be better or worse.

2. At the time when this schedule was largely made four factors impacted scheduling:

1. Uncertain roster - roster was in flux and JC did not know entirely what he had coming back
2. Some games were already committed to previously and under contract
3. Guarantees have been slashed due to COVID losses. So the idea of going to play at big name school somewhere not local was no longer financially beneficial. If you are going to play at say Kansas, a school like GW needs to get a sizeable guarantee to come play in what surely will be a very tough almost impossible game to win on the road. This limited options.
4. GW needs to win some games and establish some momentum for the program - with a new roster the OOC needed to be appropriate to allow the team to jell with so many new parts.

As a result, I'll gladly take 20+ wins against this schedule in order to get the program headed in the right direction. If that happens, I suspect that next year's schedule will look very different.

 

 

8/03/2021 11:10 am  #137


Re: 2021-2022 Schedule

20 wins. Really? 
Of course everyone on the board would be happy with 20 wins. But, let's not get carried away. I can't be the only one who has watched the last four seasons?
Time to lower the expectations... it could make the season a lot more enjoyable.
Here's a more realistic look at the season using KenPom ratings from last season
St. Francis -- win
Maryland -- loss
UC San Diego -- loss because while we were 227 and UC San Diego 231, UC San Diego is at home.
UC Fullerton -- win
Lowell -- win
Wright State -- loss
Kent State or JMU -- loss
Long Beach State, if tournament goes according to KenPom -- win
BU -- win
Charlotte -- loss because while we were 227, Charlotte at 234 is at home.
Coppin State -- win
Radford -- win
UMES -- win
GW Record -- 7-5. A winning record. A good place to start and a first for JC at GW.

So, of course, KenPom of last season is not a perfect predictor of this season, I think it puts some realism in the coming season. Until we see something different from GW under JC, I don't see how we can have any higher expectations. And I think 7-5 allows JC and TV to say the program is headed in the right direction, no matter disappointing I or others think that 7-5 is.
We will have lots to talk about this season.
 

 

8/03/2021 11:18 am  #138


Re: 2021-2022 Schedule

I of course would like to play some of the schools we played in 2013-2016 but we have to be realistic that it takes two to tango.  Those other schools may not find any value playing GW right now so we can't just force things to be how we wish they'd be.  Also, while it's fun to go up against the bigger schools, I don't really have any desire to see us play FSU or South Carolina and lose by 20+ points, even if we make money for the school doing so.  I like JC's desire to schedule locally, I just wish we'd make sure to try to pick out schools that will be value adds like say a Liberty or Temple.

 

8/03/2021 11:35 am  #139


Re: 2021-2022 Schedule

Will be fun to see Noel Brown go up against his former HS teammate Qudus Wahab.

Also, one of Knapp’s teammates treansferred to Wright St so there’s another reunion. 

Only other thing I’ll say is that I wouldn’t base our schedule off last year’s KenPom rankings. If the coach expects us to take a leap forward than this is clearly a disappointing schedule.  It’s a much better fit for a 220ish team than the top 150 team we should become.

 

8/03/2021 12:26 pm  #140


Re: 2021-2022 Schedule

No complaints whatsoever over a lack of guarantee games or practically automatic losses to top 25 teams.  I'll repeat what I said..I would rather have swapped a couple of sub-200 opponents for a couple in the 100-150 range.  UNCG, Vermont, Butler, Akron, BC (always BU, never BC), Miami, Cincinnati, Old Dominion (152 last year).  Each would have represented a more challenging opportunity that our players would likely have embraced (and possibly came away with a win) compared with 9 or 10 sub-200 opponents.   This all assumes of course that we will be much better this season which I believe we will be.

Am just not buying the "we have to learn to walk before we can run" adage.  This is for all intents and purposes a brand new team.  That adage fits a young team of primarily underclassmen learning to play together.  This team has veteran pieces in Bishop, Lindo, Lee, and Adams.  They must learn to gel, pretty quickly in fact, but there's no need to treat this team with kid gloves.

 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum