Online!
Last night saw arguably the best played game of the tournament thus far (Kansas State-Michigan State was a masterpiece), the best ending to a game thus far (Gonzaga over UCLA was beyond crazy), and an incredulous storyline in Florida Atlantic, a school that not even the great Mike Jarvis could put on the basketball map, advance to the Elite 8 by defeating a team that had just pounded the crap out of Duke. Rarely does this tournament disappoint.
If Mark Few is the greatest coach in the history of the planet, his evil twin must have taken over last night (and I say this as someone who miraculously won his bet on the Zags). In the first half, UCLA did not attempt a single shot that was closely contested. Maybe Gonzaga played like this all year but their only interest seemed to be to outscore the opposition without expending any energy on defense. They cracked down in the second half and eventually held a 10 point lead with under 90 seconds left. Then, some of the absolute worst coaching I've ever seen. Turnovers under pressure while failing to use one of their two timeouts left. Inbounding the ball to a 57% free throw shooter when UCLA had to foul. Taking shots with 15+ seconds on the shot clock rather than drain the clock. It all enabled UCLA to overcome a double digit deficit and subsequently take the lead.
LA Colonial wrote about the Strawther shot (to win the game) which UCLA failed to contest but I'm going to call it something other than a nice long shot. Despite Few indicating that this was a play the team worked on, this shot came from the March Madness logo, a seemingly 30 foot shot give or take, and something that I don't believe under any circumstances could be referred to as a high percentage shot. Despitwe K-State's Newell having a 20 point, 19 assist night, he tried two of these shots late in regulation and overtime of the Wildcat win and did not come close on either attempt. It was incredible to think that this Strawther shot was the best play Few and Gonzaga could come up with in these circumstances with the season on the line. It obviously worked, but I am still astounded that it did.
Offline
The added Greatness of that epic UCLA vs Gonzaga game, was that not only was it a rematch of the Final 4, overtime thriller won at the buzzer 2 years ago by Gonzaga, it was a rematch of much of the same stars:Timme Watson Strawther Jaime Jaquez Tyger Campbell etc etcIncredibly rare in the era of 1 and Done and Transfer portal.
That's a lot richer experience than seeing Kentucky and Duke roll out entirely new teams 1 year from the next.
Same thing with those great Jay Wright Villanova teams from 2016 to 2018 the same cluster of players, year after year. Hope the sport still retains some more of that in the transfer and 1 and done era.
Offline
I love it when there are no #1 seeds left in the elite 8. An ideal final four would be no seeds over 5.
Offline
Congrats to Jim Larranaga, on back to back Elite 8s.
The first Coach in history to make back to back Elite 8s as a 5 seed or lower.
As our GW Coach, CC spent nearly 20 years helping build this with JL, congrats to CC as well, Miami's success is very good for GW too
Last edited by The Dude (3/24/2023 11:47 pm)
Offline
Great games, especially for me to see SDSU (second alma mater) beat the #1 seed and #1 "ick" program.
Offline
If Florida Atlantic, why not GW?
Offline
That Uconn/GU game was decided early. Refs scare me.
Offline
[color=var(--primary-text)]
Congrats to UConn and Dan Hurley, the #1 Computer team going into today and much of the year and they looked very much part in all 4 NCAA Tourney games.
Looking like 2018 Villanova the only other team in history to win every game by this big a margin.
Wish The A10 was capable to hang on to a Coach this good but alas, bigger things were in the future for a guy like Hurley who stayed at Rhode Island about as long as one could hope for
Congrats as well to Florida Atlantic! what a story they are.... terribly underseeded with top 10 Computer #s and proving they too were no fluke
Great tourney for the non power programs... and even the newly formed Big East with its Missouri Valley, A10 and American schools combo outperforming the true Power 5s[/color]
Last edited by The Dude (3/25/2023 10:46 pm)
Offline
Alum '04 wrote:
If Florida Atlantic, why not GW?
Not to mention Miami seems to have a formula for winning in March with 3 guards, a terrific glue guy sf, and one great big. Could definitely see CC putting that kind of roster together for us (not that we have the NiL for the same level of talent, but we can get good players to play CC’s system.)
Offline
Big thing about FAU is all these guys played together last year. It wasn’t some portal magic.
So for GW to ever do it, we really need some roster consistency. Not gonna happen until 24-25 at a minimum.
It’s why SLU and Dayton were so disappointing this year. They actually brought back their key guys and should’ve been FAU.
Offline
GW0509 wrote:
Big thing about FAU is all these guys played together last year. It wasn’t some portal magic.
So for GW to ever do it, we really need some roster consistency. Not gonna happen until 24-25 at a minimum.
It’s why SLU and Dayton were so disappointing this year. They actually brought back their key guys and should’ve been FAU.
Then again, K St only had 2 of their players on the roster last year and they went to the Elite 8. There’s more than one way to succeed right now.
Offline
"America's Greatest Coach" flames out again. Amazing.
Offline
San Diego St and Florida Atlantic to the Final 4!!
As good a year as there's been for the non Power 5s, even as the Committee pushes every last one possible out of the field
7 of the 9 rotation players for San Diego St are seniors.
Agree with those who are expressing continuity as the key for GW (and really any program) a few select Power 5s can do it with mostly tranfers, that's never going to work at GW.
I would say about Kansas St... a very small school initially landed 5'8 Nowell out of NYC, (Little Rock) nothing stopping GW or any other upper level Mid Major from finding diamonds in the rough like that. That is as much a key to winning as anything
Last edited by The Dude (3/26/2023 4:00 pm)
Offline
17 years ago, a very young CC with George Mason as a young assistant was Final 4 Bound
1 year ago a very senior, now Associate Head Coach CC lost in the Elite 8
Today, those players are Final 4 bound.
CC played for almost 2 decades the Tommy Lloyd role. So Kudos, and above all kudos to Miami and Jim Larranaga. Jim has to be HOF bound with this resume. What a career.
Offline
As I watched Coach Larranaga being interviewed after the great win, I imagined Coach Caputo in the same role in a couple of years!
Offline
AT Hiker wrote:
As I watched Coach Larranaga being interviewed after the great win, I imagined Coach Caputo in the same role in a couple of years!
At Miami?
Offline
I guess the other way to look at the Final Four is that Caputo was the factor that kept Miami (Fla) from reaching the Final Four-- after all he left and suddenly the Regional Finals were no longer the celling! (Are you going to argue with that logic?) Also, SD St took its loss to GW at Madison Square Garden and built on it to reach this new pinacle.
No matter how irrelevant it may be, there is ALWAYS a local angle.
Offline
The non Power 5 clearly the story of this tourney, also What a tournament for The Big East:
UConn has dominated all 4 games and enters The Final 4 #1 KenPom team in the nation and the clear presumptive favorite for the title
Creighton lost in the final 1.1 second in the Elite 8
Xavier made The Sweet 16
Other than Marquette bombing out as a 2 seed in round 2 great tourney for The Big East.
Offline
Interesting comments Charles Barkley made on 60 Minutes last night about college basketball. Not good.
Online!
It's time to offer a little nuance to the P5/non P5 discussion just to offer some clarity on the issue. First and foremost, this tournament still offers automatic bids to I believe 31 schools who have earned the right to represent their conference, almost always by winning their conference tournament. At least up until now, there has never been any discussion about changing this. (Not saying it isn't a conceivable consideration down the road but for now, there has been zero evidence of this.) So let's be clear that no committee has ever sought to exclude any of these schools who win their conference tournaments.
Those non P5/BE schools who have had success in this year's tournament include Gonzaga, San Diego State, Furman, Florida Atlantic, Princeton, Fairleigh Dickinson, and Houston. Two footnotes: first, FDU should not have actually been in the field, but Merrimack is still ineligible as a new D1 program. And while Houston was technically an at large because they lost their conference final to Memphis, everyone knows that Houston had a ton of injury problems and was one of the best teams in the country all season long.
The others on this list all earned their right to be there and were able to capitalize. So if you would like to believe that the midmajors were blatantly ripped off insofar as not enough of them making the Dance to begin with, then it's far more instructive to look at those midmajors who did make the field as at-large teams. There weren't very many:
Nevada lost in its play-in game to Arizona State
Boise State lost to Northwestern in the first round
Utah State lost to Missouri in the first round
Houston won a few games but if we look at this like we should, that Houston should be the AQ and Memphis the at-large, Memphis lost to Florida Atlantic in the first round.
Excluding Houston, only St. Mary's pulled off a first round win over VCU before falling in the next round to UCONN.
When analyzing these results, in all objectivity, why would anyone think that the midmajors deserved more at large slots? Who would these teams be? Hofstra, after the College of Charlston lost in the first round? Dayton, after VCU lost in the first round? New Mexico, after the 3 Mountain West at large schools went winless? Nobody from the AAC, MVC, or WCC. Perhaps the singular case that could be made would be North Texas, out of Conference USA, who is still alive in the NIT (as is UAB but they really couldn't have been considered), had strong computer numbers, and was the runner-up to Florida Atlantic.
After the seemingly countless numbers of posts whining and complaining about how the little guys are disrespected and deserved more at-large bids, the summary is that:
1) Many of these teams who were automatic qualifiers made the most of their opportunities. So yes, the midmajor Automatic Qualifiers did have (and are having) an excellent tournament.
2) Because #1 took place by no means should infer that other schools from these conferences are deserving.
3) Based on the tournament's results, North Texas is literally the only non P5-BE who has a legitimate case for being upset over not having been selected.