GW Hoops

You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



3/24/2026 10:01 am  #81


Re: The March Madness Thread

LA Colonial wrote:

Prior to 2025, when was the last time no team from a major conference made the sweet 16?Prior to 2025, there has never been a time since the NCAA Tournament expanded to 64 teams in 1985 that no team from a major conference made the Sweet 16. 
In fact, the 2025 and 2026 tournaments represent the opposite extreme: for the first time in history, the Sweet 16 was composed entirely of teams from major (power) conferences, leaving no room for "mid-major" or "Cinderella" teams in the second weekend.  Historical Context


  • The 2025 Shift: The 2025 tournament was the first time since the 1985 expansion that every single Sweet 16 team came from a power conference.
  • 2026 Repeat: This trend continued in 2026, marking the second consecutive year that mid-major conferences were shut out of the Sweet 16.
  • Past Comparisons: Before 2025, mid-major teams (such as those from the Atlantic 10, Mountain West, or WCC) reached the Sweet 16 every year for decades. For example, in 2023, teams from 11 different conferences were represented in the Sweet 16. 

 Sweet 16 Conference Breakdown (2025 vs. 2026)Both years saw a total takeover by the "Big Five" (ACC, Big 10, Big 12, Big East, and SEC).  Conference 2025 Teams2026 TeamsSEC7 (NCAA Record)4Big Ten46Big 1243Big East02ACC11Mid-Majors00                    

Not a coincidence LA Colonial.  This is the "arguably unintended consequence" of NIL and the transfer portal.  Former talented mid-major players move up in order to make more money. Talented upperclassmen (except likely NBA draft picks) stay at majors longer because the pay is better than the G league (and they don't have to play overseas at least right away). The result is a wider disparity than ever before between the majors and everyone else.  

 

3/24/2026 10:50 am  #82


Re: The March Madness Thread

Not a coincidence indeed Mayhem.  I predicted this well before the 2025 season.  There will be few, if any upsets by mid-majors as so few will be in the tournament to begin with and the Power 5 will get any player who shows promise from the other conferences.  In 2025 there was one first round upset (McNeese over Clemson) and two first round upsets in 2026 (VCU over UNC and High Point over Wisconsin).  So what made March Madness so great is now gone.

Yet the ratings were up 5% to watch predictable outcomes one after another.  I attribute this to legalized gambling which is keeping the ratings up.  

In 2016, even though GW did not make the tournament (we did win the NIT) there was hope we could make it and be competitive.  Now the NIT is our ceiling unless we are somehow able to win the conference tournament , something we have done exactly twice in my 58 years watching GW hoops.  Bottom line is that I have minimal interest in following GW or March Sadness any more. 

 

3/24/2026 12:59 pm  #83


Re: The March Madness Thread

LA Colonial wrote:

Not a coincidence indeed Mayhem.  I predicted this well before the 2025 season.  There will be few, if any upsets by mid-majors as so few will be in the tournament to begin with and the Power 5 will get any player who shows promise from the other conferences.  In 2025 there was one first round upset (McNeese over Clemson) and two first round upsets in 2026 (VCU over UNC and High Point over Wisconsin).  So what made March Madness so great is now gone.

Yet the ratings were up 5% to watch predictable outcomes one after another.  I attribute this to legalized gambling which is keeping the ratings up.  

In 2016, even though GW did not make the tournament (we did win the NIT) there was hope we could make it and be competitive.  Now the NIT is our ceiling unless we are somehow able to win the conference tournament , something we have done exactly twice in my 58 years watching GW hoops.  Bottom line is that I have minimal interest in following GW or March Sadness any more. 

 
Totally agree. They are slowly turning the Big Dance into the Last Dance. Extinguishing everything that made it was it is (or was).

I actually thought Baker would be a decent NCAA head,  In fact, he’s been so bad one can’t help but wonder if he was just a “Manchurian Candidate”:for the Power 5 schools.

Last edited by Alum1 (3/24/2026 1:01 pm)

 

3/24/2026 1:32 pm  #84


Re: The March Madness Thread

And when this recognition finally sets in for the GW Administration someone is going to ask the important question ... why are we spending so much money when we could play in the Patriot League for less money and have the same chance (maybe better) of playing in the NCAA tournament? I promise you that day is coming soon. You can't spend $5 million plus on basketball year in and year out (including NIL) and have virtually no chance at the Big Dance absent an A-10 tournament championship. Why not spend $2 million or less and have perhaps a better chance? It sucks that we have to talk like that but reality bites sometimes.

 

3/24/2026 2:49 pm  #85


Re: The March Madness Thread

With regard to the tv ratings being up 5%, it's worth pointing out that this is the4 first year that Nielsen has changed its measurement system, now combining set-top box and smart tv data with their historical panel data.  This has resulted in much greater numbers for almost all live sporting events with greater emphasis now placed on viewing in bars and out-of-home viewing in general.  Viewership would likely be flat if they were still using the prior means for measuring viewership.

 

3/24/2026 3:10 pm  #86


Re: The March Madness Thread

Saint Joes and Dayton 2nd tourney road victories moved the A10 to 5 out of their last 6 wins, all 6 true road games

Saint Joes plays at New Mexico tonight, Dayton plays tomorrow

     Thread Starter
 

3/24/2026 4:48 pm  #87


Re: The March Madness Thread

How do you buy the best players out there? It's pretty bad down here when you see the increased pressure to buy the best baseball players in the country (Vanderbilt, Tennessee, etc.) These schools are driving the old fans away. What was free now costs a lot of money just to see any college game in the SEC. My father use to tell me about the colleges down here are just football "factories". UT spends a huge amount of money trying to win football games, but it's just money thrown away, because they can't win anyway. Sad.

 

3/24/2026 8:00 pm  #88


Re: The March Madness Thread

Gwmayhem wrote:

 When Mason and VCU lost their national semifinal games, these were two of the worst rated Final 4 games to ever air on CBS.    

Sorry, but you are dead wrong about that, though I generally agreed with and appreciated your take.

GMU-UF 2006 -- 9.1
Butler-VCU 2011 --- 8.3

In comparison

UNC-Duke 2022 -- 8.6

https://www.sportsmediawatch.com/ncaa-final-four-ratings-history-most-watched-games-cbs-tbs-nbc/

Last edited by Alum '04 (3/24/2026 8:00 pm)

 

3/27/2026 12:06 am  #89


Re: The March Madness Thread

9 seed Iowa to the Elite 8!

     Thread Starter
 

3/27/2026 11:10 am  #90


Re: The March Madness Thread

Alum '04 wrote:

Gwmayhem wrote:

 When Mason and VCU lost their national semifinal games, these were two of the worst rated Final 4 games to ever air on CBS.    

Sorry, but you are dead wrong about that, though I generally agreed with and appreciated your take.

GMU-UF 2006 -- 9.1
Butler-VCU 2011 --- 8.3

In comparison

UNC-Duke 2022 -- 8.6

https://www.sportsmediawatch.com/ncaa-final-four-ratings-history-most-watched-games-cbs-tbs-nbc/

Thanks for pointing this out Alum '04.  My statement was one of those things I had heard a while ago and wrongly assumed it was true today.  There are three things to note:

1) I'd have been better off saying total viewership rather than rating.  You can see that viewership for VCU and Mason in the final 4 was on the low end, to a greater extent than was the television rating.

2) Since Mason and VCU, Turner has now handled a number of Final 4's (as part of its broadcast partnership agreement with CBS) and viewership numbers on Turner have historically been lower than on CBS.

3) The age of streaming has brought far greater audience fragmentation with individuals having far more choices for entertainment than ever before.  It stands to reason that ratings would be higher in a day and age when there was no Netflix, Amazon, HBO Max, Apple TV, etc.

 

3/27/2026 11:19 pm  #91


Re: The March Madness Thread

Danny Hurley and the 2 Time National Champions UCONN beat Michigan State

Back To the elite 8 for UCONN!

     Thread Starter
 

3/28/2026 5:33 pm  #92


Re: The March Madness Thread

The Dude wrote:

Danny Hurley and the 2 Time National Champions UCONN beat Michigan State

Back To the elite 8 for UCONN!

MSU fought back from 16 down only to tie it up, but couldn't get over the hump and take the lead. Had to be absolutely excruciating.

 

3/29/2026 6:28 pm  #93


Re: The March Madness Thread

Duke blows big lead, lose to a Hurley. 

 

3/29/2026 6:44 pm  #94


Re: The March Madness Thread

Between 2013-2016 my HS played the Sr. Hurley and St. Anthony 5 times. We won 4 of the 5. That was something. Before that we couldn't get within 40 points of that team. Few NJ schools could. Great coach.

 

3/29/2026 6:47 pm  #95


Re: The March Madness Thread

That final inbound play looked like something GW would do to snatch defeat from the jaws of a victory….loos of composure and just a bad pass

 

3/29/2026 6:48 pm  #96


Re: The March Madness Thread

UCONN comeback for the ages to beat Duke!!

Hurley and UCONN are back in the Final 4!!

Mullins from the logo!! What a thriller

     Thread Starter
 

3/29/2026 7:36 pm  #97


Re: The March Madness Thread

PKGW wrote:

That final inbound play looked like something GW would do to snatch defeat from the jaws of a victory….loos of composure and just a bad pass

Exactly.

And how about Hurley with adjustments and calling plays/giving instruction late game, not having (young) others do it.

 

3/29/2026 8:03 pm  #98


Re: The March Madness Thread

I was thinking how smart Duke was to wait until 10 seconds left and then foul to deny the 3 to tie, but it obviously didn’t work out for them.

I am no fan of Hurley or UConn, but I thoroughly enjoyed watching them beat Duke, and that ending was amazing!

 

3/30/2026 7:46 am  #99


Re: The March Madness Thread

PKGW wrote:

That final inbound play looked like something GW would do to snatch defeat from the jaws of a victory….loos of composure and just a bad pass

I will admit that on the replays I was looking to see if Caputo was on the Duke bench! 
 

 

3/30/2026 9:49 am  #100


Re: The March Madness Thread

As is often the case in this tournament, Duke-UCONN offered an incredibly exhilarating finish for one team while simultaneously serving up about the most imaginable heartbreak on the other side.  I attended the games on Friday night and I can assure you that I did not see this coming.  Duke-St. John's resembled a heavyweight championship fight (do these even exist anymore?) with each team alternating winning rounds.  The Red Storm was determined to make this game all about toughness and I couldn't get over how well Duke responded, personified by Caleb Foster who played exceptionally well after breaking a bone in his foot less than three weeks ago.  It was a shame that Foster could only give Duke 14 underwhelming minutes on Sunday but ironically, the guy who really stepped up for him was Cayden Boozer.  On the other side, UCONN had blown a 19 point lead to Michigan State but to their credit, took back the lead on their next possession on two occasions.  I do not enjoy the histrionics and petulant antics of Hurley but I'll give him lots of credit in that he instills a belief among his players that they are not going to lose regardless of the game's circumstances. Maybe having Bill Murray giddily jump up and down right behind the bench helps keep things loose too.

Dissecting the game's final sequence would be easy to do even if this was one of the first games you ever witnessed.  Boozer could have stood still with the ball in which case there would have been a small chance of getting stripped but a much larger chance of getting fouled.  He, or his coach, could have called timeout.  (Easy to say in retrospect but you just can't lose a game like this without having used all of your timeouts.)  Instead, we should remember that a split-second decision was required and Boozer instinctively thought to get the ball downcourt where there were no UCONN defenders in which case Duke could have dribbled the clock out or dunked to put the game away.  He will unfairly be grouped with someone like Georgetown's Fred Brown who mistakenly handed the ball to James Worthy, or Michigan's Chris Webber who called a timeout that his team didn't have, as someone who made a boneheaded play to cost his team a shot at a championship.   No matter your feelings towards Duke (and I understand all of them), it lacks human decency not to feel for a young man who sat in the locker room in tears and told reporters that he had just ruined his team's season.  How (fortunate) he grew up, or that he plays for Duke, really shouldn't enter into the equation.

The temptation is to suggest that Michigan-Arizona is now the de facto national championship game and whoever wins that one will be crowned on Monday night.  This all makes sense logically but when it comes to The Big Dance, we should know by now to throw logic out the door.  A freshman from Indiana sank a 35 foot shot to keep his season alive and now gets to play in the Final 4 in his home state, the same one that gave us Hoosiers.  It doesn't get much more storybook than this.

 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum