Offline
Toro
Offline
We are like a junior high school team.
Offline
More turnovers, walk, stand out of bounds sick!!!!
Offline
Geez they’re making Fordham look like Dayton
Offline
jf wrote:
Yes, Lonergan's poor recruits. Toro one of the better rebounders in the country before being badly used this year. Juice, a key reserve who it was noted average double figures in limited minutes in a key stretch last year. We'll discuss all Lonergan's recruits on another thread.
Objectively Toro has been awful since the Davidson game.
Offline
ZONE!!!! 1-3-1 , 2-3, Match Up?
Offline
10 made baskets, 15 turnovers.
Offline
Gwmayhem wrote:
I think they are going to win big today, by double digits easily.
You were talking about Fordham?
Offline
On the bright side, with the NCAA announcing they are barring fans from the tourney, and a decent chance that the final rounds of the A10 follow suit, this is a good year for us to suck this bad.
Offline
On another subject, who is going to be the new women's coach? Or more misery.
Offline
Odd that our big men are often guarding the smaller, quicker player and a smaller guy is guarding the big man. And no help. This is beyond normal switches, etc.
Offline
Long Suffering Fan wrote:
One measure of a good coach is an ability to make half time adjustments and get back in the game. Lets see what happens.
10 minutes into the second half and Fordham has increased its lead. Where are the adjustments? How is this not on the coach? This is Fordham for crying out loud. You need to figure out a solutions...that is what you are paid to do.
Offline
28 points in 30 minutes
Offline
Steve "Long Suffering Fan" Watsky, your parade of 17 new phony names to replace the last set of 17 fake names isn't fooling anyone.
Each one of them clamoring for more Toro, speculating about firing Coaches and transfers out of GW. Well I've got news for you Steve, the few actual non humans here, who are not your fake, phony names know this:
Toro is not a good player Watsky. Nice guy, plays hard, can't finish 2 feet from the rim, Juice, also a nice guy, plays hard, easy to like, not a good player. Having 17 names all complaining about the same things on a board with 6 guys posting isn't fooling anyone Watsky.
Today its crying about Fordham, not long from now "they" will be crying about firing JC.
BGF, is this the board you want to represent the GW fan base? this is what was going on the last site. "Fire fire fire." Fire the AD, fire the Coach, fire the woman's Coach too says 17 fake names.
After a GW win, 3, maybe 4 names, all of them real humans with 1 poster name, posting. the fake parade of 17 "suffering fans" stone silent.
Offline
50-33. Do we have any good players coming in? Any 3 stars?
Offline
Don't want to jump on The Dude for this wildly inappropriate post in his name until it is confirmed it is him.
Sounds like the ghost of someone else from the old board.
Toro will have the opportunity to go somewhere good if he wants.
Offline
You need to do grow up, Dude. Or at least learn a little about the game you profess to love. I have always used only one board name. Sadly for you, I am not the only person who recognizes stupidity. Please ban this guy, Barry. This is what ruined the old board.
Last edited by Long Suffering Fan (3/11/2020 4:03 pm)
Offline
What would the analytics say about trying one of our best 3 point shooters: Adam? With Potter feeding him
Down by a lot and anyone can give up an open 3.
Offline
For what it's worth I used to post on the old board and have decided to watch and read the posts mostly to see who we are recruiting. My early post is what i believe. I attend most games and graduated from GW and was a scholarship athlete. I do believe one can post their opinion, which i have done. I'm not Steve. I am very discouraged as a fan and a supporter.
Offline
Great bailout by Armel, trying to will it all.
But down by 14 or so with 4 minutes left, we might want to use up less than virtually all the shot clock.
Maybe a piece of advice for next year.