Understand what JJ is saying and he has provided a very realistic view of inside the Athletic Dept. And appreciate his clarification, without endorsing the language of the reference to other posters.
Interest in a coach who left only 5 years ago and the last time we were a real overall threat,as well as our only national tournament championship,is quite appropriate here.
Personally interested in Mike Jarvis and Bob Talent,as well as Hobbs, even Mojo,etc. We often hear about Pikiell here who was a GW assistant more than a decade ago.
If the conversation veers into the past too much for most tastes,put it on Rewind. But let's not reflexively react negatively to an event,like a disputed firing of a coach we are still massively reeling from--as not worthy of discussion.
When we stop losing to the likes of William and Mary,UMBC, etc. and start being a top tier team,then it will be less relevant to the current situation, but still relevant to GW basketball history,which has always been fair game here.
The Athletic Dept has done a masterful job of pretending Lonergan didn't exist, particularly during the Nero era. But even today,with not posting the NIT team trophy pick (or if they did,sure didn't see it on the recent anniversary) and we know why.
By the way,JC very admirably has not pretended ML doesn't exist and took a picture with him. He was able to handle it.
We speculate on other college teams and coaches here all the time,including a thread active right now. But we're supposed to pretend ML didn't exist or we don't care about someone who turned down nearly $2 million a year, nearly triple his salary to stay at GW,which dismissed him shortly afterward?
As a further point of relevance: we played UMBC last season and have in the past. So we would certainly be interested in speculation on their coach,much as we have just been discussing their coach leaving.
It's months to tipoff. Think if we keep it civil, we can discuss all things GW basketball-related,much less GW-related.
Last edited by jf (4/07/2021 5:26 pm)