Offline
Unless we somehow ever find out all the schools that approached us that we turned down to play UMES and Radford, all I can assume is that this is the best schedule we could get and leave it at that.
We have to play better to get invited to better MTEs. Simple as that.
Offline
Actually Mayhem, I looked at one "strength of schedule", saw it was close to 300, and used the eye test before I made the comment, but it was hardly meant to be the focal point of my commentary. My (fill in your own term) comment, complaint, whine, bitch was that playing and losing to low ranked teams in an arena that is consistently 2/3 to 3/4 empty was not all that much fun. Another argument is that I am generally a believer that playing against good competition makes you a better team. Does anyone really believe that the schedule we played has prepped us for the start of conference play?
Offline
One additional point to learn from this exercise....when LSF says he noticed a SOS of close to 300, and GWRising reports a SOS of 206, I'd offer this as proof that there is more than one way to analyze or critique a schedule's degree of difficulty.
Offline
So much disrespect for these "lower-level" teams. I'm not sure what games you were watching, but the teams that kicked our butts were better teams than GW. A few of them definitely had some better players than we did, especially in the low post. In recent years, the A10 has become a mediocre conference, with teams that are on a par with some of these "lower-level" teams we've played. So, I would say that the level of competition is about right. It's not about who gets higher rankings in hyped-up statistical analyses, but about 5-on-5 on a gym floor, otherwise, why play the game at all.
Online!
It's not disrespect, though understand your point.
It's just that, understanding all the vagaries of college basketball including seniors at "lower level" schools (hard when you turn over all but one-non player of an entire team in 2 seasons), we shouldn't be losing to these teams with the frequency that we have in the past couple of years. And playing the way we have.