GW Hoops

You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



1/18/2025 3:58 pm  #41


Re: Next Up: GW at George Mason

Great team effort yet a tough loss.
One free throw away from a road W.
Glad Jun was physically better and getting into the flow.
When we fly around on D it can disrupt anyone!
The officiating left a lot to be desired but not why we lost.
Bad turnovers out of timeouts needs work.
Looking forward to VCU

 

1/18/2025 4:02 pm  #42


Re: Next Up: GW at George Mason

Really proud of how tough the team played. Great defense and great effort on the boards. I just feel bad for the players to lose a 2OT game. And I continue to be baffled about how bad we are out of timeouts. Some people on here questioned why Caputo didn’t call one before the last shot in regulation, but I was honestly glad he didn’t…

 

1/18/2025 4:13 pm  #43


Re: Next Up: GW at George Mason




Last edited by GW0509 (1/18/2025 4:15 pm)

 

1/18/2025 5:32 pm  #44


Re: Next Up: GW at George Mason

With all the contact allowed at the rim dunks required.

I know these players and this staff haven’t been here for 40 years, but there must be a reason  why GW runs terrible end half and end of game offense?

 

1/18/2025 6:54 pm  #45


Re: Next Up: GW at George Mason

Out of the country and didn’t get to see game or highlights.  Can someone explain what Caputo is complaining about?  What happened?

 

1/18/2025 7:00 pm  #46


Re: Next Up: GW at George Mason

Free Quebec wrote:

Out of the country and didn’t get to see game or highlights. Can someone explain what Caputo is complaining about? What happened?

Felt like GW should've gotten a call in the final moments of the OT.

Video here: https://x.com/david_korn4/status/188071246152516427

 

 

1/18/2025 7:04 pm  #47


Re: Next Up: GW at George Mason

There were a lot of bad calls in the game, but I thought they were pretty even handed.

 

1/18/2025 11:16 pm  #48


Re: Next Up: GW at George Mason

just a couple of thoughs.
1.  At least of late, we are a much better team with Jones in and Jacoi out.  
2.  We are a better team with Autry playing more
3.   Henson does some nice things.but he is not an A-10 quality starter.   Problem is, I don't know who works better.    
4.    Bevins can defend.
5.    I would like to see more of today's Buchanan (even though I won't count on his 3 point shooting.   But he did not force the issue today and still had 15, 8 and 2.
6.   It is completely inexcusable for a player to shhot 0-10 from the 3.   When your shot isn't falling, stop taking it.
7.   We need to stop the bonehead, ill advised passes.   And of course we need to make our layups.
8.   We have played very well our only 2 road games, both against top of the conference talent (URI and Mason).   Notwithstanding, this loss today hurt very much.

 

1/19/2025 1:10 pm  #49


Re: Next Up: GW at George Mason

Teo excruciating losses this season because we couldn't make one free throw at the end of regulation--American and Mason.

 

1/19/2025 10:55 pm  #50


Re: Next Up: GW at George Mason

Very simply and clearly-- Buchanan was 5 for 5 from the field; why couldn't he get more shots. He was hardly in the offense late in regulation and in the OTs. Meanwhile his teammate goes 0-10 three pointers. 

 

1/20/2025 9:55 am  #51


Re: Next Up: GW at George Mason

Tough way to lose, but overall a good performance from GW. GMU is tough and their defense is legit. This GW team is clearly very streaky offensively, but you have to think some better shooting performances are ahead almost by default. GW has also played the second toughest conference strength of schedule so far (after Loyola) so the games coming up should be a bit easier with a chance to pick up some wins.

General Thoughts:
1) If the refs are going to the monitor to review a play, it is likely to go against GW. This is especially true if the play being reviewed is checking for a goaltending vs. a clean block. CC is probably expecting it at this point.

2) If there is a 50/50 play on a loose ball, somehow GW will not come out on the right side. This isn't because of lack of effort - they dive for loose balls and do what they need to do. The ball just bounces to the other team.

3) If GW is given a transition opportunity after coming up with a nice stop on defense, they will find a way to get their shot blocked at the rim. In general, transition execution has been horrendous, and I can't remember a GW team in recent history that gets their shots swatted so often. Per KenPom, GW is currently 340th in offensive block percentage. You can't help but laugh at this point and wonder if there's other factors involved outside of bad luck. The first half of the American game showed early signs of that, but it has continued.

4) I had no idea Rafael wore contacts.

5) It is clear Rafael over-performed at the FT line to begin the year. While his FG% remains very good, some of his close proximity shots probably should be made instead of him trying to earn the points from the FT line. I liked that he responded by making both FTs in overtime after what transpired in regulation. His offensive rebounding/overall presence has been a major boost to the team. Castro is an underrated passer/rim presence as well. Once he fouled out, it felt like game over for GW.

6) I expected Sean to struggle against GMU's frontcourt, but thought he did a better job than expected overall. As much as I like watching him as a passer try to find a cutting guard in the halfcourt, the degree of difficulty on those passes can be high. As a result, a couple times per game his passes go directly to the other team. There was one in particular where the Mason defender didn't even have to move and just picked up the ball. That needs to be cleaned up - unsure if it's a communication thing or the pass needs to be executed better.

7) Trey Autry can be prone to making mistakes on both sides of the ball (usually it's on defense). Despite that, I'm really liking the confidence he's playing with right now. Kinda like every time it's a victory when Hansen decides to shoot, it's a win when Autry tries to attack the rim. Per KenPom, he is now 85th nationally in 2P%, which shows he's been efficient at the rim as well. Since Moss got hurt, Autry has certainly stepped up his play. He comes down with some big rebounds defensively which tend to go unnoticed as well.

8) CJ is such a pain to play against defensively. I think he's a near-lock to make the all-A10 all-defense team if he sticks around (this year may be tough as a freshman). 10 steals in the last two games. Offensively, he's still finding himself (understandable). Some layup attempts I'm sure he would love to have back, but give the Patriots credit for making him adjust on some of them. His three point shooting efficiency seems to have been hurt by the fact that most come with the shot clock nearly expired. There's no doubt his stroke is unorthodox, but when he has the ball he seems hesitant to take a three unless there's no other options.

9) Gerald needs to get himself set before launching threes. Several of his attempts came off curls at the top of the key. As soon as he collected the ball, he often launched it. That made the degree of difficulty harder than it needed to be. This is not gymnastics or diving. You do not earn extra points from taking a more challenging shot. I do give Drumgoole credit that later in the game he began to attack the rim more as Mason closed out on him hard. He has definitely improved his inside finishing lately.

10) The staff finally put Jun in different places and it resulted in a much more efficient day from him. Funnily enough, he also went 2/2 from deep against Mason around this time last year. Maybe it is just me, but his shooting stroke seemed a bit more compact than usual? I have to agree that perhaps we could have had him more involved for stretches of the game, but as long as the team is taking good shots it is okay. Perhaps fewer shots allowed Jun to compete on the boards more as well. We needed his physicality against this GMU frontcourt for sure. Good to see him playing healthier.

11) Jacoi is playing with low confidence right now and needs something to go right for him in the worst way. Sophomore slumps are not uncommon, but it feels like he regresses each game. Against GMU, it looked like he struggled to even execute bounce passes to another player. His defense has remained good, but every game I'm rooting for something to go right for him. The fact that he saw only 11 minutes in a double overtime game suggests that CC may be losing hope. Hutch is still seeing time down the stretch of games (which I still personally like) but he played fewer minutes Saturday than he ever has at GW (including freshman year).

12) I love Ty's defense and think he has a lot of upside on offense. He played as many minutes as Jacoi. Unfortunately, he was the latest victim to have his shot blocked in transition after an impressive deflection on D.

13) Trey Moss was clearly not healthy out there, but I still believe that his hustle and penetration really benefit the team when he's right. Like the other Trey, he's 68% inside the arc (61st nationally), I just wish he would cut down on the three point attempts. Almost all of them are undershot. In the Mason game, he came down with a tie up on defense but tried to find another teammate to avoid the jump ball call. That decision resulted in a turnover. At the time, the possession arrow was favoring GW. I know that you like to save those extra possessions for later, but trying to get the ball to another teammate in traffic is more likely to result in a turnover or a jump ball anyways. Sometimes, it's better to just eat the jump ball call and get the ball back. Compared to WBB, it's not like MBB gets that many jump balls usually anyways (not because of lack of hustle, it's just less frequent).

14) Dayan has played exactly five minutes the last two games without attempting a shot. I wish we could find a way to get him more involved offensively when he's in. Having said that, he's the one guy on the team who ends up pulling things out even when he has an advantage in transition. Maybe he's also noticed the number of shots GW has had blocked at the rim and figures it's better to just wait for other teammates to join him on the other side of the court.

15) GW needs to shoot better from the FT line to win games. That goes without saying. Specifically for the GMU game, they turned it over too much. The Patriots are great defensively, but they are not an event-driven team. GW just handed them the ball many times. That one minute stretch with about eight minutes to go in the game was killer, including a turnover from trying to inbound the ball. It's easy to blame CC for not taking a timeout, but I do agree with his philosophy in close games you want to pocket as many as possible (now execution out of timeouts when they are taken as others have mentioned is a different story and needs to be better).

16) While I thought the play CC was worked up over wasn't particularly egregious (and the officiating in overtime was more even), Mason definitely benefitted from calls in regulation. When GW was ahead for over 3/4 of the game, the only thing that kept GMU remotely close was the FT line. They get there a lot so you can't blame all the whistles, but GW is also top 25 in FT rate yet they took maybe 1/3 of the attempts in the first 40 minutes. Perks of being the home team I guess. Anyways, definitely not the reason the Revs lost but it was noticeable.

 

1/20/2025 10:53 am  #52


Re: Next Up: GW at George Mason

1)  If ever there were an opponent to show off your depth against, it would be a George Mason team who is dead last in the conference in taking care of the ball.  Instead, GW# played five players at least 36 minutes (out of 50), a 6th player 21 minutes, then 11, 10, 5 and 5.  Not what I would call balanced.

2) The problem isn't that young guys can't play so many minutes.  Of course they can.  The problem is that you want fresh legs always on the floor when trying to force turnovers.  Instead, Mason committed one fewer turnover than their season average despite a game that went 10 more minutes than normal.  Given the extra time, this was a chance to help force GM into a number closer to 25 turnovers rather than 15.

3) CC is unafraid to make big moves when it comes to the bigger picture.  He took away Max Edwards's starting job last year and has done the same with Jacoi this season.  However, where I need to be critical is his inability to make such moves within a game.  It's as if he has a "pitch count", expressed in minutes played, for each of his players and he goes with that regardless of how well or how poorly they are playing.  Gerald is the obvious case in point.  It didn't take that long for anyone to realize how streaky a three point shooter he is.  In a stretch of 3 games excluding the D2 matchup, he shot 18-36 from 3 and averaged just under 29 minutes per game.  In his last 3 games, he has shot 2-26 from 3 while playing 29, 31 and 38 (2OT) minutes.  What's also maddening is that he has shot 8-14 from 2 in these games, and only has 3 assists in these three games.  It's pretty simple, if the long ball is not falling, focus on shooting from closer in or play less.  However, I believe that the team's philosophy is not to do this, but to rather keep shooting the 3's as if there is some definitive law that they will eventually start falling.   I would much prefer to see a team that poses a threat to score from anywhere, keeping defenses more honest in the process, than to continue to hoist up 3's when the team is clearly not feeling it.

4) I'm perfectly fine with CC not calling timeouts at critical end-game situations as long as his team knows what play he would like them to run.  The problem is that the team has looked anything but sure in these situations over the Duquesne and GM losses.  Actually, they did have a play run against Duquesne but their defense blew it up and we had no contingency for this.  

5) Great point DMV regarding Hanson.  There's a time to attempt the very high degree of difficulty pass and a time not to.  During the late stages of a very tight game is one of those times not to.

6) Seemed like we had good success lining Jun up along the baseline where he was able to both hit the 3 and make strong baseline cuts.  Then, the team went away from this as Jun just remained a decoy in the corner.  There is little doubt that for this team to be successful, it's going to have vto figure out some middle ground between Jun having the ball in his hands on every possession and Jun taking 5 shots in 36 minutes.

7) I, too, was proud of the effort.  This team hasn't dogged it under CC and I can't imagine this happening anytime soon.  It's frustrating to again see a more than winnable game slip away.  This team just doesn't have a ton of experience closing out tight games.

     Thread Starter
 

1/21/2025 12:09 pm  #53


Re: Next Up: GW at George Mason

Just recorded a new episode of GW Basketball Insiders. We mostly discussed the George Mason game but got into some other stuff as well. Let us know what you think and thanks in advance for listening!

https://www.youtube.com/live/TyR0vYWk8Kw?si=QjuIqTA3azQHk2Jg

 

1/22/2025 10:58 am  #54


Re: Next Up: GW at George Mason

Liked the episode alot.  Couple of thoughts.  The reason for the numerous blocked shots in transition could be youth but is also not finishing strong or finding contact. Moss, CJ, Jun, and Castro are good finishers.  Jacoi and Ty have been tentative. 
Free throws are all about confidence and being mentally at ease. Same for shooting 3’s.  Castro was swishing his first 8 free throws this year. Then something got into his head. Same with Jun. Same with NFL kickers getting yips on extra points.
Finally, the Gerald dilemma. I don’t care if the shot goes in or not. Just don’t be desperate!  His shot selection can be horrible leading to easy fast breaks the other way.  And each time a drive to the hoop results in going to the ground is another 5 on 4 advantage against.
Just get into a rhythm Revs and beat UMass!!

 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum