Not much of a stat stuffer, but I would go with Matt Hart.  Dude was a key contributor on one very good team, and one team that should have been good but underachieved due to not great coaching.  This guy came to us from the D3 ranks, but you wouldn't know it.

If this was all really about Anti-Semetism, then why does the demand letter to Harvard require the discontinuation of DEI programs, "Merit Based" hiring and admission reforms, and viewpoint diversity?   Please let me what that has to do with Anti-Semetism.   Are you saying the unqualified minorities Harvard is supposedly hiring or admitting are all anti-Semites?  Or, could it be that the claims of Anti-Semetism are just the front to attack DEI policies, which the administration has done across the board.
 

With all the talk of the starters coming back, I just wanna say how proud I am of Trey Moss for coming back.  This is a guy who saw his PT fall off a cliff when we transitioned from non-Conference to A-10 player.  Today, a lot of players would transfer after that type of adversity.  I am so happy he has the toughness to stick around continue his basketball career at GW.  I think he's got a great chance to be a contributor on what is shaping up to be a pretty good team.

I am going to miss Jun the person.  I think he's exactly the kind of player want at GW and I wish him all the success in the world. 

I am not as upset about losing Jun the player.  Jun was good at doing what he does, but he never really seems to fit with what the rest of the offense was trying to do, or what it really needed from someone playing his position.  It seemed the team really found success when they started to move away from him offensively and started to feature the guards and Castro.  We could use more players that fit into that offensive system, while also potentially being a defensive upgrade.

The important thing here is that in today's world, Jun leaving frees up a note of NIL money (I have to assume he was the biggest earner on the team).  With him gone, that money can go to keeping Castro and Jones/Autry (who were more the core of the offense), while also brining in another player who is a better fit or first more of a need (a real shooter or another big)

This falls into my standard to how to handle yourself at a game. 

If you are a grown-up, be respectful or be silent.  College kids are still kids, and booing or heckling kids as an adult is lame.  Officials, however, are always fair game.

If you are in college, heckle away.  They are your peers and you can have some fun with this.

The thing that seems crazy to me from the write-up above is that VMI is a military school whose basketball team is comprised of ~50% foreign players.  I don't know much about VMI the institution, but I wouldn't expect that.

If they finish this off by adding UNLV and Nevada, that isn't a bad little conference for football or basketball.  If they could then poach Gonzaga and St. Mary's as non-football members, that could be a pretty solid Pac 10.

Thanks for this information.  I totally agree with this being the best deal in town.  My issue is only I have a 2 year old who will now need his own seat, and a wife schedule to give birth in February.  So, we have some cost vs. usage calculus.  Though, I have had season tickets in some form for 20 years, and it would be hard to give that up.

This is just another embarrassment under the Nero/Vogel leadership of the athletic department over the past decade.  I don't understand how Vogel still has a job here outside of being an alum.  I can't think of one thing she has done that inspires confidence that this is the right person for the job.  Outside of the Swimming program, are any of our teams successful?  Have we had one PR win in the past 5 years?

I wanted to re-up this thread due to the recent losing streaks by both the men and women's teams.  This isn't meant as an "I told you so", but more to gauge the temperature in the room the way the season has progressed for both teams.  Are we still as convinced that these extensions were the right move, or do you think knowing what we know now that we should have taken a more conservative approach?